TypingDNA Alternatives & Competitors

12 companies similar to TypingDNA — AI based Authentication and Fraud detection.

AimBrain

Award-winning fraud detection & user authentication platform, based on Deep Learning.

2 Venture round $4.37M

United Kingdom

Big Data Cyber Security +1

Compare

Keyless (part of Ping Identity)

Now Ping Identity. Simple, secure, private biometric authentication. ➡️ Follow us at Pin...

41 Select $27.90M

London, United Kingdom

Analytics Cyber Security +3

Compare

Callsign

Pioneering digital trust through proprietary technology that uniquely mimics the way human...

236 Venture round $38.75M

London, United Kingdom

AI Analytics +5

Pinn

We make authentication customizable, frictionless, and secure!

8 Seed

Redwood City, United Stat...

Analytics Cyber Security +1

Rival Readout

Competing with TypingDNA? We do this properly.

10 rivals, 90 days of dated moves, ranked by what matters and sourced, in 7 business days.

Book a 7-day Readout

BioCatch

We fight to make banking safer every day.

459 Private Equity $2.72B

New York, United States

Analytics Big Data +2

Castle

Defend against bots, fraud, and abuse.

48 Venture round $11.56M

Brooklyn, United States

Big Data Cyber Security +3

Saffe

Fraud prevention with AI, privacy & convince. NIST top performer facial biometrics & liven...

8 Seed $1.05M

London, United Kingdom

AI Analytics +5

Kount, an Equifax Company

A complete approach to trust and safety. Advanced technology delivers confidence in every...

89 Private Equity

Boise, United States

AI Big Data +2

F8th Inc.

17 Grant $120.00K

Montreal, Canada

AI Big Data +3

ThreatMark

Bringing trust to the digital world by disrupting fraud.

88 Venture round $11.55M

Charlotte, United States

AI Analytics +6

Deduce

Deduce protects businesses from AI-generated identity fraud

24 Series B $26.30M

New York, United States

AI Analytics +2

DataVisor

The most powerful AI fraud and AML detection platform trusted by the world's largest brand...

162 $94.50M

Mountain View, United Sta...

AI Big Data +2

About TypingDNA

TypingDNA, founded in 2016 and headquartered in the United States, operates in cutting-edge industries including AI, API, Analytics, Big Data, Cyber Security, and SaaS. The company specializes in AI-based authentication and fraud detection by recognizing users through their typing patterns, thus providing an innovative...

Services

Cloud Authentication, Verify 2FA, ActiveLock, Continuous Endpoint Authentication, Authentication API

Target Customers

remote workforce, corporate enterprises, IAM platforms, students for e-learning, financial services

Business keywords

AI-based Authentication, Fraud Detection, Typing Biometrics, Keystroke Dynamics, Behavioral Biometrics, Biometric Authentication, Biometric Security, Predictive User Profile, Account Takeover Prevention, Continuous Authentication, Zero Trust Security, Prevent Device Sharing

Business Model

B2B, SaaS, API

Revenue Model

Subscription, Usage Based, Service Fee

Frequently Asked Questions

Companies similar to TypingDNA include AimBrain, Keyless (part of Ping Identity), Callsign, Pinn, BioCatch. They work in Big Data and Cyber Security and share TypingDNA's focus on fraud detection, continuous authentication and biometric authentication.

Bounce Watch lists 12 companies that share TypingDNA's industries and are closest to it in business tags, services, target customers, business model and size.

From the desk

Mapping a market? Start with a Rival Readout.

In 7 business days we read 10 rivals around TypingDNA: 90 days of dated moves, ranked by what matters to you, each with its source. Fully credited if you continue.

Book a 7-day Readout Get a free snapshot

Explore Related

TypingDNA Profile AimBrain Alternatives Keyless (part of Ping Identity) Alternatives Callsign Alternatives All Companies All Signals Trend Reports

Compiled from the BounceWatch company index. We last looked at TypingDNA on 12 Apr 2026. The 12 companies listed here were last checked between 11 Sep 2024 and 30 Sep 2026. Where a field is blank here, it means we have not recorded it — not that the answer is zero. How we source and date this.